Geochemical Exploration Intelligence

The first software that makes
lithogeochemistry audit-proof.

OroMina ingests raw lab data, identifies the chemical signature of mineralization, and produces a defensible drill-targeting report — with a quantified error bar on every number.

Get in touch See how it works ↓
8/8 validation datasets passed 35 → 5 hours per drill program NI 43-101 ready QP-defensible error bars
The problem
“Global mineral exploration spends $12.4 billion a year on drilling. Fewer than 1 in 100 programs result in a viable discovery.” S&P Global, 2025

Behind every targeting decision sits a manual spreadsheet — no quantified uncertainty, no audit trail, no defensible math. OroMina replaces it.

$12B
Annual global exploration spend
<1%
Greenfield drill success rate
30hrs
Expert time per program, manual
Zero
Error bars on a typical spreadsheet report
How it works

From raw lab files to a
defensible deliverable.

01
Ingest

Drop in raw lab files from ALS, SGS, or Bureau Veritas. Multi-lab CSV and Excel with multi-row headers. OroMina auto-detects orientation, normalises iron, classifies elements, and flags QA/QC issues — without any configuration.

ALS · SGS · Bureau Veritas · Multi-lab
02
Analyse

A proprietary engine identifies the chemical fingerprint of mineralization across every sample. The result is a single, validated, audit-grade classification — with a confidence level on every element.

Audit-grade output · Quantified uncertainty
03
Deliver

A defensible PDF report, a Leapfrog-ready CSV, and a drill-targeting vector — with a quantified error bar on every mass change value. QP-ready, built to survive regulator review on first pass.

PDF · Leapfrog CSV · NI 43-101 · JORC
What it delivers

Numbers that speak
for themselves.

35→5
Hours of expert time per drill program
7×
Faster reporting than manual analysis
$3.5M+
Modeled annual saving, mid-major client
8/8
Validation datasets — VMS, carbonatite, porphyry Cu
The business case

Where the savings
come from.

Built from independently verifiable inputs: consultant rates, drill costs, decision frequency. Single-digit % of saving, captured as licence.

01

Expert time displaced

Senior geochemists spend 30+ hours per program on manual analysis. OroMina compresses it to under 5.

$400K – $700K /yr
02

Drill meters not wasted

Even a 3% improvement in targeting on a $60M program is real money. Quantified uncertainty makes the decision defensible.

$1.5M – $3M /yr
03

Bad campaigns avoided

One spurious anomaly triggers a $1.5M–$4.5M follow-up campaign. Quantified uncertainty stops that cycle.

$1.5M – $4M /yr
04

Audit and report cycle

Technical Reports survive QP and regulator review on first pass. Weeks of revision — gone.

$80K – $200K /yr
$12.4B
Global exploration spend
2,210
Active mineral explorers globally
Top 100
Dominate drilling spend
$10M+
Saving potential, global major
Why now — and why us

A category that
doesn’t exist yet.

Regulatory tailwind

NI 43-101 and JORC reviewers now expect quantified uncertainty on every number in a technical report. The compliance bar is rising — fast.

Defensible moat

ioGAS, Leapfrog, and Datamine visualise data. OroMina is the only tool that interprets it — and attaches a defensible error bar to every conclusion.

Built by a geochemist

Competitors hire geologists as advisors. OroMina was designed from the ground up by a PhD geoscientist with real underground mining experience.

Open to conversations

Investors. Advisors.
Pilot partners.

The first software to make lithogeochemistry audit-proof is looking for its first collaborators.

zemri@oromina.ca
Investors Advisors Pilot Partners